Wednesday 4 November 2015

D&T in schools: its value to children today and tomorrow


Yesterday’s Ebacc announcement from Nicky Morgan could be seen as another nail in the coffin for design and technology (D&T); on top of the reducing budgets, teacher recruitment crisis and changing exam specifications this means that D&T teachers are having to defend their subject to parents, pupils, head teachers and MPs.

So why is D&T an essential part of a broad and balanced curriculum?

This seems a simple opening question to ask new trainee teachers, but it is less straightforward to answer. Even in official documents and within the D&T community there is disagreement and contention. I’ve come to the conclusion that these different perspectives about the value of D&T are part of the subject’s vibrancy, but we need to harness them into a cohesive structure that defines the value of D&T.

Defending D&T

Over the past two years I’ve interviewed people about why they think D&T is a valuable school subject. In my initial study I talked with D&T teacher trainers (people like me) and trainee D&T teachers, and from these two groups I was able to integrate their values into a list of 22 different values of D&T (in the table below).

The two groups agreed that D&T is a subject that can be of value to an individual child whilst in school and studying D&T, and when they leave school. But they also said that D&T is of value to society.

In the table I’ve split the values into two types and compared which values each group had. The two types are:
·       the value to children whilst they are at school
·       the value to children and society outside (and after) school.

I’m not claiming these values are the definitive values of D&T but they do show the variety of values people have of D&T. It also shows the different values just two groups have of D&T.


Values
D&T teacher educators
Trainees

The value of D&T for children whilst they are at school
  
1
Activity of designing

2
Alternative to academic subjects

3
Designing for future needs and opportunities
4
Examination and questioning of the made world

5
Freedom to take risks and experiment
6
Helps the understanding of human beings' position & existence
7
Identifying problems to be solved

8
It is fun and enjoyable

9
Learn from evaluating personal success and failure
10
Learning happens through using brains and hands together
11
Meaningful activity of solving real problems with real solutions
12
Personal ownership of decisions and actions
13
Provides a practical purpose for other school subjects

14
Using raw materials to make a product

The value of D&T to children (and society) outside school and when they have left school 

15
Become aware of the economic impact of technological developments
16
Considers the ethics of technological development
17
Contributes to the nation's industrial and economic competitiveness

18
Develops the skill of creativity
19
Develops the skills of autonomy and collaboration

20
Empowers society to act to improve the world
21
Learn practical life skills

22
Learning of vocational skills and techniques that open doors to careers
Table 1: Comparing values of D&T teacher educators and trainee teachers by type

Using these values to defend D&T

Steve Keirl (2007) reminds us that ‘D&T teachers periodically find themselves offering some sort of defence of the subject’ (p.550) - my research could help D&T teachers, and its many advocates, celebrate D&T’s strength and defend its contribution to a school’s curriculum.

As D&T implements changes to the curriculum, GCSE and A level, I think it is important that we have continue to debate the value of D&T. This series of values could form part of that discussion and provide a framework for that debate.

In D&T departments each teacher could rate these values in order of importance and compare. Departments could discuss their agreements and disagreements. Further conversations could ask ‘How do pupils know why we think is important?’ ‘How do we show our values of D&T in our lessons? School senior leaders could also join in the discussion, comparing their values with the D&T teachers.

By understanding the values held about D&T by different groups of people, such as parents and senior leaders, we may come to a collective understanding about the many reasons why D&T should be taught in schools.

This series of values does have a limitation; currently it only represents the values of the two groups discussed here. The next version will include the opinions of others including pupils, D&T teachers, school senior leaders and parents.

References

Keirl, S., 2007. The politics of technology curriculum. In: D.Barlex, ed., Design and technology for the next generation. Whitchurch, England: Cliffeco Communications, pp. 60-73

This blog post is a shortened version of an article in Design and Technology Education: An International Journal


No comments:

Post a Comment