Yesterday’s
Ebacc
announcement from Nicky Morgan could be seen as another nail in the coffin
for design and technology (D&T); on top of the reducing budgets, teacher
recruitment crisis and changing exam specifications this means that D&T
teachers are having to defend their subject to parents, pupils, head teachers
and MPs.
So why is D&T an essential part of a broad and balanced curriculum?
This seems a simple opening question to ask
new trainee teachers, but it is less straightforward to answer. Even in
official documents and within the D&T community there is disagreement and
contention. I’ve come to the conclusion that these different perspectives about
the value of D&T are part of the subject’s vibrancy, but we need to harness
them into a cohesive structure that defines the value of D&T.
Defending D&T
Over the past two years I’ve interviewed
people about why they think D&T is a valuable school subject. In my initial
study I talked with D&T teacher trainers (people
like me) and trainee D&T teachers, and from these two groups I was able
to integrate their values into a list of 22 different values of D&T (in the table below).
The two groups agreed that D&T is a
subject that can be of value to an individual child whilst in school and
studying D&T, and when they leave school. But they also said that D&T
is of value to society.
In the table I’ve split the values into two
types and compared which values each group had. The two types are:
·
the value to children whilst
they are at school
·
the value to children and
society outside (and after) school.
I’m not claiming these values are the definitive values of D&T but they
do show the variety of values people have of D&T. It also shows the
different values just two groups have of D&T.
Values
|
D&T teacher educators
|
Trainees
|
|
The
value of D&T for children whilst they are at school
|
|||
1
|
Activity of designing
|
✓
|
|
2
|
Alternative to academic subjects
|
✓
|
|
3
|
Designing for future needs and
opportunities
|
✓
|
✓
|
4
|
Examination and questioning of the
made world
|
✓
|
|
5
|
Freedom to take risks and
experiment
|
✓
|
✓
|
6
|
Helps the understanding of human
beings' position & existence
|
✓
|
✓
|
7
|
Identifying problems to be solved
|
✓
|
|
8
|
It is fun and enjoyable
|
✓
|
|
9
|
Learn from evaluating personal
success and failure
|
✓
|
✓
|
10
|
Learning happens through using
brains and hands together
|
✓
|
✓
|
11
|
Meaningful activity of solving
real problems with real solutions
|
✓
|
✓
|
12
|
Personal ownership of decisions
and actions
|
✓
|
✓
|
13
|
Provides a practical purpose for
other school subjects
|
✓
|
|
14
|
Using raw materials to make a
product
|
✓
|
✓
|
The
value of D&T to children (and society) outside school and when they have
left school
|
|||
15
|
Become aware of the economic
impact of technological developments
|
✓
|
✓
|
16
|
Considers the ethics of
technological development
|
✓
|
✓
|
17
|
Contributes to the nation's
industrial and economic competitiveness
|
✓
|
|
18
|
Develops the skill of creativity
|
✓
|
✓
|
19
|
Develops the skills of autonomy
and collaboration
|
✓
|
|
20
|
Empowers society to act to improve
the world
|
✓
|
✓
|
21
|
Learn practical life skills
|
✓
|
|
22
|
Learning of vocational skills and
techniques that open doors to careers
|
✓
|
✓
|
Using these values to defend D&T
Steve Keirl (2007) reminds us that ‘D&T
teachers periodically find themselves offering some sort of defence of the
subject’ (p.550) - my research could help D&T teachers, and its many advocates,
celebrate D&T’s strength and defend its contribution to a school’s
curriculum.
As D&T implements changes to the
curriculum, GCSE and A level, I think it is important that we have continue to
debate the value of D&T. This series of values could form part of that
discussion and provide a framework for that debate.
In D&T departments each teacher could
rate these values in order of importance and compare. Departments could discuss
their agreements and disagreements. Further conversations could ask ‘How do
pupils know why we think is important?’ ‘How do we show our values of D&T
in our lessons? School senior leaders could also join in the discussion, comparing
their values with the D&T teachers.
By understanding the values held about D&T
by different groups of people, such as parents and senior leaders, we may come
to a collective understanding about the many reasons why D&T should be
taught in schools.
This series of values does have a
limitation; currently it only represents the values of the two groups discussed
here. The next version will include the opinions of others including pupils,
D&T teachers, school senior leaders and parents.
References
Keirl, S., 2007. The politics of technology
curriculum. In: D.Barlex, ed., Design and technology for the next
generation. Whitchurch, England: Cliffeco Communications, pp. 60-73
This blog post is a shortened version of an
article in Design
and Technology Education: An International Journal –
No comments:
Post a Comment